At this point, you might be familiar with various obelisks, the most notable of which is the Washington Monument, which can be seen in Washington, District of Columbia. However, in contrast to the Washington Monument, this obelisk is carved out of solid bedrock, more specifically rose granite with a high concentration of quartz.
This places it at a seven out of ten on the Mohs scale of hardness, which disproves what contemporary Egyptologists claim were the tools that were utilised in order to carve this stone.
For instance, current Egyptologists assert that dolerite Stone hammers and bronze chisels were utilised in order to carve an obelisk out of this solid piece of bedrock.
On the other hand, a sizeable number of contemporary stone masons have asserted that, to put it simply, that is not even remotely feasible. And the fact that it would be, in essence, the same as attempting to cut and carve wood using another piece of wood, which does not function like that at all.
The issue that must then be asked is, “What would have been done to construct this undertaking in the absence of dolerite Stone hammers and bronze chisels?”
When you take a look at the photographs that we have provided here, you can plainly make out what appear to be scoop marks made by a type of technology with which we are not familiar.
That being said, it is of the utmost significance to comprehend that this is solid bedrock, Rose granite, and that any material that was ever utilised had to have either been steel or some kind of sound resonating technology that we are simply not acquainted with today.
Now, a researcher has proved that it is impossible for them to have made these types of cuts on the underside of this stone obelisk if they were using bronze chisels and stone hammers. This is the conclusion that the researcher came to. Because of the angle, it is impossible for anyone to have made these kinds of incisions using the instruments that were available at the time.
This is something that can be seen quite plainly in the photographs. And despite the fact that those instruments, specifically the bronze chisels, were not powerful enough to perform it in the first place, it is abundantly evident that another explanation is necessary.
Now, the argument of how they cut this is one thing, and while it’s possible that over time with enough people pounding stone hammers could have done some of this, I think it’s extremely unlikely.
Sure, yes, it’s possible that over time with enough people pounding stone hammers could have done some of this. But let’s skip over the point where they cut the stone and talk about how they would have moved it instead.
The Vatican today houses one of the largest obelisks in the world, which was originally located in Luxor, Egypt. On the other hand, in order to go into the 1930s, they needed to disassemble it into different pieces, which they would then recreate afterwards.
The fact that its first portion weighed at least 455 tonnes, and that it was carried from the United States to Luxor, Egypt, a distance of more than 252 kilometres or 156 miles, is remarkable.
Now, what’s interesting about this is that its original section weighed at least 455 tonnes. The obvious next question is how they managed to move something of that magnitude. As an illustration, in the year 2012, the Los Angeles Museum of the Arts relocated a stone that weighed 340 tonnes so that it could be shown at the museum.
Now, this stone was moved out over a distance of 100 miles, and it took 11 nights to do so. However, in order to do so, they had to custom order an Emirate international truck that was 295 feet long, 196 wheels, and more than 27 feet wide.
Additionally, they had to use a million different alternate routes because no overpasses or bridges could support the incredible amount of weight that this 340 tonne stone entailed. Even though it wasn’t finished and had to be moved, this 1200 tonne obelisk weighs three and a half times as much as the previous one.
When you take into consideration the fact that one of these obelisks was transferred from its original location to Luxor, Egypt, which is 249 kilometres distant, you will see that this distance is significant. How were they able to accomplish that?
Guys, here’s the deal: I don’t have all the answers regarding how they managed to pull this off. But what I can tell you is that what contemporary textbooks are still teaching in schools today is obviously incorrect, and that there is a great deal more to the narrative than what we were taught when we were students.
After all of that has been said, I strongly suggest that you conduct some study on what contemporary masons are saying and how they’ve proved firsthand that bronze chisels couldn’t possibly have been used to cut this type of stone and that dolerite Stone hammers were used instead.
That is, you have to pound it for a significant amount of time in order to produce only a few crumbs. It’s ludicrous, to say the least.